Resources

A clearer understanding starts here.

Three introductory guides covering the questions physicians ask most often when they begin looking at practice payment change.

Request a Consultation

Guide one6 minute read

Questions to ask before changing your practice's payment model

A working list of the questions that tend to determine whether a payment change is workable, grouped by the part of the practice they affect.

Start with why, in specific terms

Most physicians who look at this are responding to something concrete: administrative burden, declining margin on particular services, staffing costs, or a sense that the practice has drifted away from the medicine. Naming the specific pressure matters, because different pressures point toward different solutions.

If the underlying problem is the cost of billing, a payment model change may help directly. If the problem is volume in a saturated market, it may not. Being precise here saves a great deal of work later.

Questions about your current position

What share of your revenue comes from each payer, including Medicare?
Which services carry your margin today, and which do not?
What does it cost you to bill and collect, counting staff time and software?
What do your payer agreements say about notice, termination, and continuity of care?
Are you employed, in a group, or otherwise bound by agreements that limit your options?

Questions about the model you are considering

Which services would move to direct payment, and which would stay as they are?
How would you price them, and what is that price based on?
How many patients would need to accept that price for the practice to work?
Is there evidence of demand at that price in your market, or is it an assumption?
Does the arrangement change your obligations to any payer or program?

Questions about the transition itself

How long is the gap between the last claim paid and a steady new revenue pattern?
How much cash does the practice need to hold through that gap?
What is the sequence, and what has to happen before anything is visible to patients?
Who on your team needs to be informed, and when?
What would tell you early that the plan is not working as expected?

Questions to hand to your advisers

Some of these questions are not ours to answer, and you should be wary of anyone who answers them without reviewing your documents. Take the regulatory questions to a healthcare attorney, the tax and cash-flow questions to your accountant, and the coding and claims questions to your billing adviser.

Arriving at those conversations with a written list saves professional time and produces better answers.

Guide two5 minute read

Medicare opt-out and commercial insurance: two separate conversations

Why these decisions are governed by different rules, what each one actually controls, and the confusion that follows from treating them as one subject.

Different sources of authority

Medicare opt-out is a matter of federal law and regulation, administered through Medicare Administrative Contractors. Its requirements do not depend on what any private company agrees to, and they are not negotiable between you and a payer.

Commercial payer participation is contractual. What you may do, and on what notice, is set out in the agreements your practice signed. Two practices in the same building can have materially different obligations because they signed different contracts.

What each decision actually controls

Medicare opt-out governs how you may be paid for services furnished to Medicare beneficiaries.
Commercial participation governs your relationship with a specific private payer and its network.
Out-of-network billing describes how you bill when you are not participating in a given network, which is a further distinct arrangement.
Practice structure labels such as concierge, membership, or direct-pay describe how your practice is organized and does not by itself settle either of the first two.

Where the confusion causes problems

The most common error is assuming that a decision in one area resolves the other. A practice that stops participating with commercial payers has not thereby changed its Medicare status. A practice that adopts a membership structure has not thereby answered what it may bill.

The second most common error is timing. These decisions have different notice requirements and different practical lead times. Sequencing them as if they were one project tends to produce either a rushed regulatory step or an avoidable contractual problem.

A more useful way to hold it

Treat them as two parallel tracks with a shared destination. Each track has its own requirements, its own advisers, and its own timeline. The plan brings them together at the point where patients experience the change, which is usually later than physicians expect.

Specific requirements in either track should be confirmed against current official sources and reviewed with qualified advisers before you rely on them.

Guide three6 minute read

Preparing your team and patients for a practice transition

How to plan the conversation before the change, prepare the people who will have it, and give patients enough information to make their own decisions.

The change is experienced at the front desk

Whatever the plan looks like on paper, patients meet it as a question at check-in or a phone call about a bill. The quality of that moment does more to shape how the transition is received than any letter you send.

That means the front desk needs to be prepared before anything is announced, not after the questions start arriving.

Prepare the team first

Explain the reasoning to your staff before patients hear about it, and give them room to ask questions.
Write down the answers to the ten questions you expect most often, in plain language.
Agree who handles the harder conversations and when to escalate to a physician.
Practice the wording out loud. Scripts that read well often do not speak well.
Make sure billing, scheduling, and clinical staff are giving the same answer.

What patients need to know

What is changing, stated plainly and without jargon.
When it takes effect, and what happens to care already scheduled.
What it will cost them, and how and when they will be asked to pay.
Whether they can continue to see you, and what their alternatives are if they choose not to.
Where to ask follow-up questions and get a real answer.

Give people time

Patients making decisions about their own care and finances need notice. Compressed timelines produce anxious calls, avoidable attrition, and a version of the story that spreads faster than yours.

Notice periods may also be governed by your existing agreements or by applicable requirements, so confirm what you are obligated to provide before deciding what you would like to provide.

Plan for the months after

The transition does not end on the effective date. Expect a period of repeated explanation, some patients returning with questions after their first bill, and adjustments to workflows that looked fine in planning.

Deciding in advance who tracks that feedback, and how often the team reviews it, turns the first months into information rather than noise.

Have a question these guides did not answer?

Send a short note about your practice and what you are considering. You can also read the frequently asked questions first.

Request a Consultation Read the FAQ